"His goal, however, has never been to develop a theory of aesthetics, a way to separate the good from the bad. If someone offers a principle of aesthetics, he said, “I think it’s pretty much always wrong.”
“Aesthetics is a big mystery, and I try not to get too metaphysical about it. I just try to be practical, like ‘How can I enjoy this story?’ I think it’s a more useful question. But they ask, ‘What really makes this beautiful?’ I’m not sure we’ll ever answer that other question.”
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Cowen on aesthetics
There's an interesting article on George Mason University's economics program. I particularly liked this part with Tyler Cowen where he opines on his approach to art, and ultimately his thoughts on aesthetics. They basically became my own, weirdly enough, and I think it did start with getting the training in economics. Economics tends to make you focused on processes, but grounded in rationality and subjectivism. So, for theories of beauty, I have lately been more interested in why certain forms show up or disappear than I have been in trying to develop a theory of why certain forms are intrinsically better/worse. The former is more interesting to me these days. Besides, I think Cowen's right that we'll probably never answer the question of what makes something good.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment